Sabtu, 13 November 2010

A dancing robot in Japan

dancing robot A dancing robot in Japan
Scientists in Japan have taught a human-sized robot to imitate the steps of a dancer.
They say the prancing dancebot could be used to record the movements of traditional dances that are being lost as their performers die off.
To demonstrate the robot's prowess, the team programmed the 1.5 metre tall machine to imitate the graceful sways and whirls of the Aizu Bandaisan, a Japanese folk routine.
To prove its accuracy, the robot can perform alongside a human dancer. And despite its "Terminator" appearance, the robot is remarkably lifelike.
Shin'ichiro Nakaoka and his colleagues at Tokyo University taught the dancebot - named HRP-2 or Promet - by using video-capture techniques to record human dance movements. According to New Scientist magazine, these were converted into a sequence of robotic limb movements and fed into Promet's processors.
"They have got it to directly copy human movements. That is very difficult because the joints of the robot are very different from the joints of a human," said Noel Sharkey, a robotics expert at Sheffield University. The advance would allow robots to perform human-like movements on factory production lines, for example.
Although its rendition of the mainly upper-body Aizu Bandaisan dance is impressive, the robot - produced by Kawada Industries - has difficulty with complicated leg movements. Any step more demanding than lifting a foot is likely to result in the 58kg automaton losing its balance and falling over. The team published its results in the International Journal of Robotics Research.
Despite Promet's lifelike appearance and fluid movements, truly intelligent robot butlers or soldiers are still a long way off.
"It is not a thinking intelligent robot. What you have got is a set of processes that translate human movement into joint movements for a robot. That is it," said Prof Sharkey.
"It is not going to start copying people doing other things or doing anything really advanced."
Even simple tasks such as making a cup of tea in an unfamiliar kitchen are a major challenge because recognising objects in new environments is difficult.
Military powers are becoming increasingly interested in the possibilities that robots present. Last year the South Korean military unveiled a robot border guard built by Samsung that can shoot targets up to 500 metres away, and could be programmed with a shoot-to-kill policy.
The US is developing a remote-controlled stretcher-bearer called the Battlefield Extraction-Assist Robot (Bear) to help evacuate casualties. It is also nearing its goal of replacing one-third of its ground vehicles with autonomous robots.
As robots become more integrated into the military, it will make it easier for governments to go to war, said Prof Sharkey, because they will have to worry less about the negative public reaction to media images of body bags coming home.
The Bear robot, for example, may look cute and save soldiers but it is all part of robots taking over the battlefield, Prof Sharkey said.
"The fact it is made to look like a bear deflects your attention from what it really is. I don't see it as entirely benign. It's still developing a military technology, so ultimately it is a fighting machine."
As for the dancebot, if it can be tweaked to handle more leggy British folk dances it may be popular with purists who want to see traditional dances preserved.
"You've got two schools of thought: one which says let's preserve them in aspic and have them there forever, and another which says things never stay like that," said Peta Webb, an assistant librarian at the English Folk Dance and Song Society, in London.
She prefers to see dances change and evolve. "It is like language. If you think about the development of language we are constantly developing new slang and dropping old slang."
Others will need more convincing. "My impression is that there would still be a human element lacking. The robot would still look, for the want of a better word, robotic," English folk dancer Joe Healey told New Scientist magazine.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar